Apple’s voice assistant Siri under fire for privacy breach, tech giant to pay $95 million to settle lawsuit | Company Business News

May Be Interested In:Woman killed, driver fighting for life after car veers into wrong lane


Apple agreed to pay $95 million in cash to settle a proposed class action lawsuit claiming that its voice-activated Siri assistant violated users’ privacy.

A preliminary settlement was filed on Tuesday night in the Oakland, California federal court, and requires approval by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White.

Mobile device owners complained that Apple routinely recorded their private conversations after they activated Siri unintentionally, and disclosed these conversations to third parties such as advertisers.

Voice assistants typically react when people use “hot words” such as “Hey, Siri.”

Two plaintiffs said their mentions of Air Jordan sneakers and Olive Garden restaurants triggered ads for those products. Another said he got ads for a brand name surgical treatment after discussing it, he thought privately, with his doctor.

The class period runs from Sept. 17, 2014 to Dec. 31, 2024. It began when Siri incorporated the “Hey, Siri” feature that allegedly led to the unauthorized recordings.

Class members, estimated in the tens of millions, may receive up to $20 per Siri-enabled device, such as iPhones and Apple Watches.

Apple denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.

The Cupertino, California-based company and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to similar requests. They may seek up to $28.5 million in fees, plus $1.1 million for expenses, from the settlement fund.

The $95 million is about nine hours of profit for Apple, whose net income was $93.74 billion in its latest fiscal year.

A similar lawsuit on behalf of users of Google’s Voice Assistant is pending in the San Jose, California federal court, in the same district as the Oakland court. The plaintiffs are represented by the same law firms as in the Apple case.

The case is Lopez et al v. Apple Inc., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 19-04577.

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Fake paramedic rapist from Norwich a danger to society - victim
Fake paramedic rapist from Norwich a danger to society – victim
Ancient structural variants control sex-specific flowering time morphs in walnuts and hickories | Science
Ancient structural variants control sex-specific flowering time morphs in walnuts and hickories | Science
India's 'blockbuster' drugs to combat antibiotic-resistant superbugs
India’s ‘blockbuster’ drugs to combat antibiotic-resistant superbugs
City dogs, and owners, try to pass muster herding sheep for a day
City dogs, and owners, try to pass muster herding sheep for a day
‘People will be shocked’: Trump tests boundaries of presidency
‘People will be shocked’: Trump tests boundaries of presidency
Girl, 8, seriously injured in Ladbroke Grove double shooting
MPs back proposals to legalise assisted dying
Fast Facts: Stay One Step Ahead | © 2025 | Daily News